Noise, a consumer electronics brand based in India, has quickly turned into one of the most popular options available among price-conscious consumers who are on the hunt for smartwatches, earbuds, and audio devices. Although the brand positioning is now known in terms of cost competitiveness and stylishness, post-purchase support is also one area where customers get confused most particularly on making warranty claims. How, then, does the Noise warranty claim process actually perform on the ground? This article describes in detail the process of making a warranty claim on a Noise product, in a reviewing tone, tracking what is expected against what turns out to be the case.
What you really need to know about the Warranty Terms First
It is imperative to be aware of what the Noise warranty really covers before filing a claim. The majority of their smartwatches and audio products are being sold with a limited warranty of 1 year as of the day of purchase. This is against manufacturing defects and malfunctions under normal use conditions, not including accidental harm, or water damage (beyond any IP-rated protection), or wear and tear.
The point that plays to the fore is that activation of the warranty should be done through the Noise web or mobile. In case the product fails to be registered or lacks evidence of purchase, you can encounter hitches. This is an aspect that most users do not consider until much later, when they realize that the claim process is a little bit cumbersome.
The Claim Process:
The official steps of settling a warranty begin on the Noise Support portal. Users have to log in and complete a form with the basic product information, attach evidence of purchase, explain the problem, and make a claim request. On paper, this sounds quite pared down. However, our user experience may be different.
In this inspection, the claim was also filed about a Noise ColorFit smartwatch, which was already not syncing properly with the application and could not charge. The submission of the form was easy, and there was a computer-based acknowledgement by the means of email. The response time, however, was near 48 hours to a human. Although this is not so unreasonable, it is not exactly considered fast support, as the tech-savvy user would be expecting real-time support.
Timeline Pickup Repair:
After the claim has been approved, the Noise will normally organize a reverse pickup. Urban residents had a time limit of having the pickup within two business days. These have, however, been delayed up to a week by a few users in tier-2 or tier-3 cities. Specifically, in the given scenario, the pickup service was supplied by a third-party logistics company, which was not the most reliable tracking service.
Once the product reaches their service center, the turnaround time for Noise is usually between 7 and 10 business days. The service portal shows the status of the repair/replacement, which is, however, not updated on a regular basis. In the case of this review, it took 12 days of making a pickup and getting a replacement device, a bit longer than expected. It is not that bad, but also not anything special.
Customer Service and Communication
Among the greatest quibbles against the Noise warranty procedure is the absence of a communication initiative. The second part was the lag in the updates evidenced shortly after the first approval. The customer service through email was slow, and the chat engine on the site usually sent the visitor to the generic Q&A. A special helpline is lacking to actually talk to a service representative, which can cause some frustration in case of an issue with the claim.
In the case of the current review, an email inquiry was sent when the turnaround resulted in more than 10 days. Very close to 72 hours after, a templated response was received, and it was realized that the product had already been delivered. Although the process has resulted in replacement, ultimately, there was no transparent nature of status updates, which worsens the experience.
Replacement Quality:
A single redeeming thing was the replacement product itself. The returned smartwatch was the new one; it was sealed in the packaging in the factory, and worked perfectly. Here it is demonstrated that the time when the Noise gladly accepts the warranty, it is unlikely that they even try to fix it and return the same element, instead choosing a full replacement when the problem is legitimate.
But user experiences on forums such as Reddit and Twitter are mixed. Others claim that their devices are denied based on ill-explained reasons, like liquid damage, even on properly used gadgets. Apparently, the result of the claim strongly relies on the manner of recording the problem well and the consideration of the support team, as to whether the problem fits the specified terms.
Final Verdict:
Is the process of the Noise warranty claim trustworthy, then? It would be a hesitant yes. Assuming that your complaint can be easily covered by the warranty, you are going to be provided with a substitute or fix, though with a certain delay. The reality of the process is not broken, but the experience may be impersonal since there is no real-time support and little going on.
Noise meets its commitments most of the time; however, this brand can improve its performance in terms of communication, faster approval, and building its service network in order to have the ability to find faster pickup and delivery.
The Noise warranty process is satisfactory enough among consumers who want to get good value due to their low-end budgets. But in the scenario that after-sales service is a big determinant in your choice, then maybe you need to consider brands that have a bigger infrastructure in terms of customer support.
Also Read: The Evolution of Door Locks: Why Smart Locks Are the Future of Home Security
